Coupling the Land Surface to Radiative and Hydrological Processes in a Climate Model (01/2004 - 12/2006)

This proposal lays out a research program at the cutting edge of current issues of the connections between land surface processes and climate in the context of climate modeling. PI Dickinson has been carrying out such a program since the late 1970 when a brief administrative assignment to lead NCAR’s climate research gave him a realization that the treatment of land may be the most important element of a climate model but perhaps the most unrealistically included. The current treatments of land in essentially all current climate models have a strong heritage from my early BATS code. Over the last decade Dickinson has led major efforts to move beyond that code. Many deficiencies in early such treatments have been corrected. Current climate modeling objectives require much more comprehensive and realistic parameterizations and data use. Further diagnostics and underlying concepts are needed to better constrain the performances of land treatments in climate models. How land communicates to the atmosphere through its flux and radiative properties and so modifies clouds and precipitation, and how these are modified by aerosols, still needs to be better understood.

 

The proposed research program is formulated as a series of issues related to climate modeling. How do the modeled land processes contribute to precipitation? How can we characterize land surface processes in terms of sensitivity and feedbacks? What characterizes the dynamics of soil moisture and runoff? How are clouds and aerosols coupled to land? What bounds can be placed on the classical climate sensitivity and how is it related to coupling to the underlying surface? Some aspects of these questions are best addressed with regional foci. The selected such foci are the Amazon and northern and northwest China.

 

This series of issues will challenge a current generation of graduate students to make major contributions to climate studies. As climate models improve in other ways, it becomes increasingly evident that further focus on the issues most important for the land component are required to realize the potential of overall increased model reliability and usefulness for such international assessment activities as the IPCC. The proposed funding is almost entirely to support student research. Their training should provide the US and the world will highly capable new scientists in a very important research area. Since all my current students are either of African, African-American, or Chinese origin and the majority of them are female, the requested funding should promote the education of underrepresented minorities. However, the broad issue it is specifically targeted at is the improvement of content and application of climate models for use in national efforts to provide better forecasts of climate variability and in international assessments of the human contributions to climate change.

 

Full Proposal

 

Anuual Progress Report (10/2004)

 

Land-Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions: Mechanisms for the Seasonal Variations in Precipitation over Tropical Land (01/2002 - 12/2004)

The principal objective of the research under this grant has been the examination of the mechanisms responsible for seasonal variations of precipitation over tropical land and the determination of how these variations are affected by land-atmosphere interaction. In particular, thermodynamic and land-ocean-atmosphere processes responsible for initiation of the wet season in the Amazon and the North American monsoon have been investigated through diagnostic analyses and numerical simulation. The examination of these processes addresses the relative roles of land versus ocean SST in determining the onset of the wet seasons and the observed spatial patterns in these two regions. The components of this proposal of greatest interest to the co-investigators has been accelerated by their success in later receiving separate funding through the NOAA CLIVAR PACS program.

 

The problems we address are difficult and must be solved through the contributing efforts of many. Our group actively collaborates with many other scientists and institutions in the US and abroad. In particular, we have strongly participated in the development and applications of the Community Climate System Model.

 

Our group studies how land cover and its changes modify regional climates through their interactions with radiative and hydrological processes. How does soil moisture vary in time and how does this in turn affect the atmosphere? What are the controls in various regions on the seasonality of rainfall? Basic theoretical understanding of these issues is supported through our NSF grant. Some aspects especially need the development of higher resolution approaches for the land modeling. Such is supported through our DOE SCIDAC grant. We also consider how aerosols modify the radiation reaching land and how land processes in turn determine aerosols. Climate over land is coupled to oceanic processes such as El Nino and we study how clouds and aerosols over the ocean also interact with the climate system.

 

Our group has been actively engaged with scientists at Boston University, Maryland, Arizona, NCAR and other institutions to make better use of the latest NASA satellite data to improve the representation of land in climate models. The satellite data analyses are being done through our NASA IDS project. Part of this effort has been the redesign of the land component of climate models to make better use of observational information, and part to improve the usefulness of the NASA observations for land models. Now is a very exciting time because of the recent availability of high quality multiyear data from NASA EOS satellites, and the new Community Land Model (CLM) component (e.g. Dai et al, 2003) of the Community Climate System Model, also supported by our NSF project. The previous and current development has been spearheaded by our group (in collaboration with many other scientists). Much of our current research involves bringing together these two latest technologies to provide an improved climate model.

 

A current major thrust of land modeling as part of climate is to better combine the modeling of biophysics (i.e. the determinations of surface temperatures, water status, and water and energy fluxes) with leaf metabolic processes and through this the ties to dynamics of ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling. The key concept is that leaves in transpiring water (the main means by which soil moisture exerts climate controls) also assimilate carbon dioxide. This carbon assimilation in turn depends on the presence in the leaves of other nutrients such as nitrogen which are taken from the soil and recycled to the soil through the death and decay of plants and the dynamics of soil microbiota. The carbon assimilation is also a chief consideration in determining the major contributions that exchanges with land make to the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere and in the competitive growth of individual plant elements. Much of our activity in this area (sponsored through our current NSF project) builds upon the Community Land Model (Dai et al, 2003) and interacts with the Land Surface and Biogeochemical Working groups of the Community Climate System Modeling activity.

 

The coupling between the atmosphere and surface addressed in our other projects leads us to an overall examination of the processes of climate variability. What are the underlying causes of the most significant systems of long-term climate variability? How can we define feedbacks to better recognize all the dimensions of coupling between the atmosphere and surface? What aspects of the system are most important for its predictability (i.e. theoretical limits to prediction)? Our efforts to address such issues are supported by our NSF grant.

 

Grunt Supported Publications

Bonan, G. B., K. W. Oleson, M. Vertenstein, S. Levis, X. Zeng, Y. Dai, R. E. Dickinson and Z-L., 2002: The Land Surface Climatology of the Community Land Model Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. J. Climate, Vol. 15, pp. 3123-3149.

Dai, Y., X. Zeng, R.E. Dickinson, I. Baker, G.B. Bonan, M.G. Bosilovich, A.S. Denning, P.A. Dirmeyer, P.R. Houser, G-Y. Niu, K.W. Oleson, C.A. Schlosser, and Z.-L.Yang, 2003a: The Common Land Model (CLM) Version 1.0, Bull. Amer. Meter. Soc. In press.

Dai, Y., R. E. Dickinson and Y. P. Wang, 2003b: A two-big leaf Model for Canopy Temperature, Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance. Submitted to J. Climate.

Dickinson, R.E., J. A. Berry, G. B.Bonan, G. J. Collatz, C. B. Field, I. Y. Fung, M. Goulden, W. A. Hoffman,R. B. Jackson, R. Myneni, P. J. Sellers and M. Shaikh, 2002a: Nitrogen Controls on Climate Model Evapotranspiration. J. Clim., 15, No. 3, 278-295.

Dickinson, Robert E., Stephen E. Zebiak, et al., 2002b: How Can We Advance Our Weather and Climate Models as a Community? Bulletin. Amer.Meteor. Soc. Vol. 83, No. 3, pp 431-434.

Dickinson, R.E., J. Kiehl and P. Gent, 2002c: Widely Awaited Community Climate System Model to be Released Soon. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 83, No. 11, 12 March 2002, 119.

Dickinson, Robert E., Guiling Wang, Xubin Zeng, and Zeng Qingcun, 2003: How Does the Partitioning of Evapotranspiration and Runoff between Different Processes Affect the Variability and Predictability of Soil Moisture and Precipitation?, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 3.

Liu, Q., and R. E. Dickinson, 2003: Use of a two-mode soil pore size distribution to estimate soil water transport in a land surface model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6), 1331, doi:10.1029/2002GL016562.

Wu, W., M. A. Geller and Robert E. Dickinson, 2002a: The Response of Soil Moisture to Long-Term Variability of Precipitation. J. Hydrometeorol., Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 604-613.

Wu, W., M. A. Geller and R. E. Dickinson, 2002b: A Case Study of Land Model Evaluation: Simulation of Soil Moisture Amplitude Damping and Phase Shift. J. Geophys. Res.,Vol. 107, No. D24, 4793, doi:10.1029/2001JD001405,2002.

Wu, W., and R. E. Dickinson, 2004: Time scales of layered soil moisture memory in the context of land-atmosphere interaction, J. Climate, Vol. 17, No. 14, 2752-2764.

Yu. H., S. C. Liu, and R. E. Dickinson, 2002: Radiative Effects of Aerosols on the Evolution of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Journal of Geophysical Research,Vol. 107, (D12), 4142, doi:10.1029/2001JD000754.

Yu, Hongbin, R.E. Dickinson, M. Chin, Y.J. Kaufman, B.N. Holben, I.V. Geogdzhayev, and M.I. Mishchenko, 2003: Annual cycle of global distributions of aerosol optical depth from integration of MODIS retrievals and GOCART model simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D3), 4128, doi: 10.029/2002JD002717.

Zeng, X., M. Shaikh, Y. Dai, R. E. Dickinson and R. Myneni, 2002: Coupling of the Common Land Model to the NCAR Community Climate Model. Journal of Climate, Vol. 15, pp. 1832-1854.

Zeng, X., R. E. Dickinson, M. Barlage, Y. Dai, G. Wang and K. Oleson: Treatment of Under-Canopy Turbelence in Land Models. Submitted to Journal of Climate, 2003.

 

---

Atmospheric Dynamics and Climate

School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences

Georgia Tech

311 Ferst Drive

Atlanta Georgia 30332-0340